Will Rishi Sunak scrap the Retained EU Law Bill?

Will Rishi Sunak scrap the Retained EU Law Bill?

This week, our Prime Minister chose not to meet other World leaders at COP15 to discuss the crisis facing the Earth’s wildlife, 70% of which has disappeared in 50 years. Politicians face a massive challenge, every bit as serious as climate change. What are the chances of the UK playing a leading role in turning this grim tide?

Rishi Sunak’s influence on the World stage will depend as much as anything on his environmental record here in the UK.  So how does that look?  His decisions to reinstate the ban on fracking and commit to the net zero ambition are reassuring.  But the failure to set environmental targets, allowing a coal mine in Cumbria and continuing uncertainty over the new farming subsidy regime (ELMS) are deeply concerning. 

A key test in the coming weeks will be his approach to the Retained EU Law bill, which could wipe out 570 pieces of environmental regulation and protections.  Originating in Europe but embedded in English law, these bits of legislation tell builders where they can and can’t build, farmers when and what they can spray, local authorities what steps and safeguards are needed before taking decisions on house building.  They reach into almost every aspect of commercial life, from pharmaceuticals to fishing nets.

Few would claim that poor regulation doesn’t exist or that urgent reviews aren’t needed in some areas.  It does, and they are.  But many of the gripes vocalised by regulation hawks have more to do with sloppy administration or poorly funded agencies struggling to cope with debilitating workloads. Many more reflect a lack of awareness as to what problem the regulation is there to solve. 

Why should we be the slightest bit concerned about losing a bit of regulation?  Like death and taxes, regulation feels like one of life’s grim inevitabilities, and it’s hard to find politicians or business leaders that have any flattering words to say about it.  In many circles it has become a byword for everything that drives us mad and spoils our fun.

Man riding bike down path by a river with houses in background.

Photo, Ben Hall/2020VISION

It's often said that our woods, meadows, wild birds and insects are victims of death by a thousand cuts.  We’ve witnessed a gradual erosion over decades through seemingly small, insignificant decisions.  The converse is equally true of course.  Individual actions - to invest in a better farm slurry store, to build a bit of green space into a new housing development - create crucial openings for wildlife.  It’s in these small but multitudinous decisions that the recovery of our nature lies.  And regulations and protections, which define limits, direct behaviour and set standards, are absolutely key to these incremental steps forward.   

It's seductive to imagine a universe where we are free of the constraints and rules set by others, in which the World is out there for the taking, if only we had the grit and determination to grasp it.  But this isn’t reality.  Our impacts on the planet are now so great that there is little we can do that doesn’t affect our neighbours.  The “wild west” with its immense forests and endless plains teaming with bison has given way to a crowded room where one person snoring keeps everyone else awake. 

Regulation may never be sexy, appealing or popular, but it is one of the prices we pay for civilisation. Little wonder then that tearing up the rule book isn’t nearly as popular as some would have us believe.  A recent poll by Unchecked showed that 74% of the public think we have the right amount of regulation, and 44% feel we don’t have enough. 

One thing we don’t need is an unpopular and counter-productive bonfire of regulations, with all its wasted heat and toxic fumes.

Popular or not, there is little evidence that regulation holds back our economy.  In stark contrast, the costs of absent or ineffective regulation are all too clear.  Cancellation of the Zero Carbon Homes policy has cost the UK £2 billion in wasted energy and added £200 annually to household energy bills.  The failure to regulate effectively against air pollution causes 40,000 premature deaths in the UK.  And the effects of weak enforcement can be seen in the parlous state of our rivers across the whole country.

Rishi Sunak has pledged his reputation on restoring economic stability.  There are many things he could do to achieve this goal that would also help tackle the crises facing Planet Earth - setting clear long term environmental targets, shifting us away from fossil fuels, ending perverse subsidies that contribute to polluted rivers and beaches and rigorously enforcing sensible, carefully targeted regulation.  All these would help us as much here in the South West - where our economy relies so much on awesome landscapes and clean, sparkling seas – as they would in China or Chile.

One thing we don’t need is an unpopular and counter-productive bonfire of regulations, with all its wasted heat and toxic fumes.

Harry Barton, Chief Executive, Devon Wildlife Trust