Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

The River Otter challenges and opportunities events

Friday, November 23rd, 2012

Attend one of these events to find out more about DWT’s River Otter Project and the Water Framework Directive.

Thu 31 Jan
7.30-9.30pm
Kilmington
Illustrated talk by Scott West, DWT’s Water Policy Framework Delivery Officer and fisheries ecologist. Suggested donation £4. Meet at Kilmington Village Hall, near Axminster. Organised by East Devon DWT Local Group. For more information Christina Bows 01297 23822

Mon 11 Feb
7.30-9.30pm
Exmouth
Join this group for an illustrated talk about the River Otter by Scott West, DWT’s Water Framework Delivery Officer. Meeting to be held at the Bastin Hall, Elm Grove, Exmouth. Suggested donation £2.50 to include light refreshments. Organised by Exmouth & Bystock DWT Local Group. For more information Roger Hamling 01395 274766.

Find out more about DWT’s River Otter Project

Winter birds

Friday, November 23rd, 2012

Winter is a great time for bird life, attend one of these events

Fri 7 Dec Winter birds, including the starling roost – Somerset levels (booking essential)

Thu 17 Jan Birds and wildlife, Topsham

Sat 19 Jan – Dawlish Nature Reserve Open Day, Dawlish

Sat 2 Feb – Birdwatching walk, Exe Estuary

Wed 13 Feb – Urban peregrines, Tavistock

Sat 16 Feb – Birdwatching walk, Roadford Reservoir

Sat 23 Feb – Bird watch around the Axe Wetlands

See more of DWT’s events

Winter waders

Tuesday, October 9th, 2012

Winter is a great time to learn about winter waders.  Join a wading bird walk at:

 

Fungal forays

Tuesday, October 9th, 2012

Autumn is the perfect time of year to learn more about fungi.  We have fungal forays at:

See more DWT events

Creatures of the night

Monday, June 25th, 2012

When most of us are tucked up in our beds, a different world takes over outside and many creatures, including most UK mammals, become more active.

Compared to the creatures that have evolved to thrive in this dark arena, our limited vision fails us and other senses rush in to try to comprehend our surroundings.  This makes wildlife-spotting at night such a thrilling experience.  So why not join us at one of our many evening events this summer?

 

Glow-worms – if we’re lucky!
Tuesday 26th June, 9.45pm until late, Tarka Trail, Yelland
A walk along a stretch of this old railway line looking for the lights of glow-worms in the grassy verges.

Glow-worms, bats and nightjars
Thursday 28th June, 8.30 – 11pm, Devon Wildlife Trust’s Bystock Nature Reserve, near Exmouth
Join DWT’s Ian Chadwick for an evening searching for glow-worms, bats and nightjars.

Glow-worms alight
Saturday 7th July, 9pm – midnight, Cookworthy Forest Centre, near Halwill Junction
Search for glow-worms and moths with DWT’s Working Wetlands staff.

Bats at Bystock
Wednesday 1st and Thursday 2nd August, 8.30 – 10.30pm, Bystock Nature Reserve
Join Ian Chadwick, DWT Nature Reserves Officer, for a walk around Bystock nature reserve to discover which bats can be found there.

Dartmoor after dark
Saturday 11th August, 9pm – midnight, Trendlebere Down, near Bovey Tracey
Walk over Trendlebere Down as night falls. Watch and hear the evening animals such as nightjars and bats. Visit the ‘new Grimpen Mire’.

Bats in the house
Tuesday 14th August, 8pm, Poltimore, near Exeter
Who lives in a house like this? Batty walk at historic Poltimore house and grounds.

Bats & moths evening – part 1
Tuesday 14th August, 8.30pm – late, Broadeford Farm,  Near Braunton
An evening with bat detectors and moth light-traps.

Bats & moths evening – part 2
Tuesday 21st August, 8pm – late, Higher Bumsley, near Parracombe, Exmoor
A second evening with bat detectors and moth light-traps.

South Brent Bats
Thursday 23rd August, 8 – 9.30pm, South Brent
Explore Brent Island, the river and nearby houses for sounds and signs of bats with a licensed bat expert.

 

 

 

For further details of any of these events please follow the links above, call 01392 279244 or email contactus@devonwildlifetrust.org

 

Safety tips for wildlife spotting at night

Go carefully – take a torch and a fully-charged mobile phone and wear warm, waterproof clothing and suitable boots that can withstand uneven and wet ground.  With limited vision you are less likely to spot any potential hazards so it is worth visiting an area that you are already familiar with in daylight.

Stick to public rights of way or get the landowner’s permission to use the land.  Take a friend along with you.  If that isn’t possible, make sure that you tell someone exactly where you are going before you set out.

Finally, if you are driving and parking, don’t leave any valuables in your car.

Exploring the photographic work of James Ravilious

Monday, May 28th, 2012

 

This summer Devon Wildlife Trust, Royal Albert Memorial Museum and Beaford Arts have organised a series of events to celebrate James Ravilious’ photographs. James was a local photographer who in the 1970-80s took more than 70,000 images of rural north Devon including DWT’s Halsdon nature reserve.

James was commissioned in 1972 by Beaford Arts’ founding director John Lane to “show north Devon people to themselves”. Ravilious captured agricultural life at a time of great transition and the photographs serve as a record of country traditions that had been handed down for generations. More than 70, 000 images make up the Beaford Archive, many were captured in and around the Halsdon nature reserve.  View Beaford Art’s online archive at www.beafordarchive.org.uk

Forthcoming events:


Exhibition – James Ravilious: Reflecting the Rural
19 May-29 July
Royal Albert Memorial Museum, Exeter
This exhibition features a new selection of photographs from the Devon photographer James Ravilious (1939 – 1999): photographs taken by Ravilious during the 1970s and 1980s.  For further information please visit the RAMM website


Gallery debate – Perceptions of the Rural in the Photographs of James Ravilious

12 June 2012 at 7pm
Royal Albert Memorial Museum, Exeter
A debate on how the rural world is reflected in the exhibition photographs and its different interpretations at the Royal Albert Memorial Museum.  Visit RAMM’s website for further details


Guided walk – Dolton as seen by James Ravilious

14 July 2012 at 10:30am and 1:30pm
Halsdon nature reserve
Join DWT and Beaford Arts on a guided walk around DWT’s Halsdon nature reserve visiting sites which inspired some of James’ best known photographs taken 30 years ago. Morning and afternoon walks available. Places will be limited. Booking is essential on 01392 279244. Organised by DWT, Beaford Arts and the Royal Albert Memorial Museum. For more details about Halsdon nature reserve and to download the James Ravilious Photography Trail leaflet visit the Halsdon nature reserve webpage

 

 

 

Become a bat detective in Exeter

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

Exeter Local Group likes to make connections for wildlife – both through the city of Exeter by supporting the Exeter Wild City project, and between wildlife organisations as seen in their recent Pipistrelles and Pints event with Devon Mammal Group.  Their latest collaboration is with the Devon Bat Group who is setting up an Exeter sub-group and is trying to organise some informal surveys around the city over the summer. The aim is to look at past recorded sites and check out potential new ones and it’s a chance to learn how to use bat detectors effectively too!

If you are interested in getting involved, or know of any potential bat sites, please contact Steve Carroll, Exeter Local Group volunteer, on 07972 175340 (after 7pm) or via email: every_creeping_thang@yahoo.co.uk

Click here for further information about Exeter DWT Local Group

Signing off – After 23 years as its Director Paul Gompertz is retiring from Devon Wildlife Trust

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

Here in his last article for Wild Devon Devon Wildlife Trust Director, Paul Gompertz,  reflects on what has been achieved, what has not and what the future for the county’s wildlife might hold.

Devon Wildlife Trust's Director for 23 years, Paul GompertzI shudder to think how many millions of words I have churned out for the Devon Wildlife Trust during my 23 years working here, from passionate appeals to detailed terms and conditions of employment. But few pieces have been harder to write than this, my last article for Wild Devon as Director. Where to begin? And indeed, where to end? The swallows and martins are operating in large flocks over my house now, gathering by instinct for a journey some of them don’t even know they are going to make. In our rivers salmon are waiting patiently to spawn; their offspring will one day set off, alone and unguided, on a journey to their adult feeding grounds around Greenland. I have just walked through Cricklepit Mill to make a cup of tea, saw the dipper foraging in the leat and realised it had brought a smile to my face. The abiding sensation of my time here is one of wonder; I have had the privilege of sharing many wildlife sights and insights with people more knowledgeable than me and every one of them has added to an ever-growing awe at the myriad of wondrous, inventive and extraordinary ways in which Life manifests itself in Devon.

Success and failure
For someone who, not so very long ago, did not know that orchids could be found in the Devon countryside or that corals could be found off its coasts, the revelations afforded me by the privilege of being Director of DWT have been a source of huge personal fulfilment. There is, however, a profoundly gloomy downside to knowing that, if things don’t change soon – and dramatically – that same fulfilment will be lost to future generations. That sense of paradox has dogged my time here. I feel as if I have borne witness simultaneously to great success and great failure. When I was appointed in 1988, most of the targets I was set were organisational. I suppose there was an assumption that DWT knew about conservation; all of the challenge seemed to be about resources. So I was charged to ‘raise membership, raise money and raise the profile’. The first two are measurable. Our membership back then was around 2,000 (though records were a little uncertain!); it now stands at around 33,000. Our annual income then was about £100,000. Last year it was just over £3million. In those two areas at least we have had demonstrable success. And while it is hard to measure profile, in 2010/11 (a record year) we had 24 items on national TV and radio, on top of all our regional and local coverage. We weren’t doing that in 1988!

Two great campaigns

I did get involved in conservation, despite its absence from my list of targets! When, in 1989, a survey revealed that, of the remaining patches of Culm grassland not protected by being a Site of Special Scientific Interest, around 60% had, in a five year period, been lost or damaged, even I could see the need to act. Though resources were tight, we employed a Culm Grassland Officer. We lobbied for an about to be trialled agri-environment scheme – Countryside Stewardship – to use Culm grassland as a pilot habitat, and succeeded. We devised a broader scheme, called Green Gateway, with help from Devon Waste Management. We got both the County Council and South West Water engaged. We worked closely throughout with English Nature (now Natural England). Today we have ten people committed to the conservation of this most glorious of Devon habitats, home to the marsh fritillary, one of Europe’s ten most threatened animals. Our Working Wetlands scheme has already made over 1,000 farm visits, with many more to come. It has begun to restore large areas of Culm which had been lost to forestry and agriculture. And it was cited as an example of best practice in landscape scale conservation. That feels like success.

Corkwing in South Devon (Paul Naylor)The Lyme Bay Reefs campaign feels like success, too. Ignorant as I then was, even I could see that the destruction being caused to pretty marine things (which I now know to call marine ecosystems!) was appalling. That campaign too began with the appointment of a project officer and built from there. It took 15 years, half a million pounds and a great deal of pressure on successive Secretaries of State and Fisheries Ministers to get 60 square miles of Lyme Bay Reefs protected – and set a precedent which I like to think was a key step along the way to the Marine and Coastal Access Act and the Government’s current commitment that ‘by the end of 2016 in excess of 25% of English waters will be contained in a well-managed Marine Protected Area network’ and that ‘by 2020 we will be managing and harvesting fish sustainably’. With goals in place like that, where does the sense of ‘great failure’ come from?

Missed targets
It comes from the insidious conviction that all that we are currently doing is too little, too late. The latest strategy document from Government admits that ‘over 40% of priority habitats and 30% of priority species’ are still declining. The latest report from the International Programme on the State of our Oceans (IPSO) tells us that ‘we have underestimated the overall risks and that the whole of marine degradation is greater than the sum of its parts’. Biodiversity 2020 – the Government’s new strategy to reverse the decline in wildlife – doesn’t pay a backward glance to Biodiversity 2010, the strategy which was supposed to have the same effect in the previous decade. The Secretary General of the UN Convention on biological diversity called that collective failure ‘a total disaster’ saying ‘no country has met its targets to protect nature. We are losing biodiversity at an unprecedented rate, amounting to a mass extinction of life’. Moreover, some of the strategy now being put forward is, to my mind, cloud cuckoo land. Our Government ‘rejects the outdated idea that environmental action is a barrier to growth’ which clearlyidentifies me as well past my sell-by date. It pledges to ‘improve the delivery of environmental outcomes from agricultural land management practices, whilst increasing food production’, a trick which will need more smoke and mirrors than I am able to imagine. This seems to me a classic example of a particularly profound insight offered up by Jonathan Porritt: ‘The single most important precept behind the very idea of sustainability – that we have to learn to prosper within nature’s limits, not beyond them – is still set aside by almost all and sundry as an irritating irrelevance’. I have taken to prefacing the talks I give with the observation that ‘I am grateful that, for most of my career in wildlife conservation, I thought there was hope’. It is partly for effect, of course – but there is a strong kernel of truth in there too. I need to stop because I have heard too much of it all before, seen too many false dawns, read too much glib political spin – ‘The Government wants this to be the first generation to leave the natural environment of England in a better state than it was inherited’, for instance, which simply won’t happen; you heard it here first.

An end and a beginning
I’m not the first to play their part in the work of Devon Wildlife Trust and be drained by it, and I won’t be the last. What matters is that the organisation keeps going. The task was even more daunting when our founders set us up; the downward trends were worse back then, and there was less willingness to listen. I am proud of the part I have played, but ready to stop. DWT will continue, driven by its goal of a Devon rich in wildlife, spurred by the growing evidence that wildlife is vital to human existence and that saving it is saving ourselves. I wish Harry Barton, my successor, every good fortune. And my profound thanks to everyone who has been involved during my time here. We made a difference together; the task remains.

You told us
Wild Devon tracked down three people who joined DWT as members in 1988 – the year Paul Gompertz became the organisation’s Director. We asked them their views of the charity after many years of membership:

I shall remain a member for as long as I am around and hope to become more involved now I am retired. Keep up your dedication and all your hard work.
Elaine Underhill

My interest in DWT has been general, enjoying its various success stories. I think the appearance of otters at DWT’s Cricklepit Mill does stand out. I have always enjoyed being a member. In the last 23 years I have watched the growth and importance of The Trust and hope and believe it will continue with its all important work in the future.
Mrs M Steiner

The impact of DWT over the last 23 years has come in three overlapping areas: Acquiring and managing more nature reserves that broadly represent Devon’s variety of habitats and contain its most charismatic species. Continuing the work of environmental interpretation to create a more informed and more concerned public and thus sustain the work of The Trust. Practical assistance to private landowners to enhance the conservation potential of their land and integrate DWT’s reserves into a more wildlife-friendly countryside.
John Bradbeer

Can you help Paul?
Director Paul Gompertz is asking for support towards Devon Wildlife Trust’s Sustainable Fisheries Campaign, a subject very close to his heart. If you would like to make a donation, please contact DWT on 01392 279244 or visit www.devonwildlifetrust.org/latest-appeal/

Common Fisheries Policy – Plenty more fish in the sea?

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

Almost everyone will be familiar with the phrase sometimes offered as a consolation to someone who has failed to make a relationship work: ‘never mind, there are plenty more fish in the sea’. Only a maritime nation could come up with such a comparison; the idea of the fecundity of our seas is so ingrained in the national psyche that our Victorian forebears declined to put in place any fisheries management measures because they believed that our fisheries were, to all intents and purposes, inexhaustible.

We now know that such faith was badly misplaced. The figures from just one species –cod – tell the tale. It seems likely that, under pressure from fishing, stocks are now one tenth of what they once were. Much of that loss has been recent. The North Sea catch dropped from 287,000 tons in 1981 to 86,000 tons in 1991. The story for most fish is similar. Around 70% of the fish stocks in European waters are at present being overfished.

Fisheries management has been back on the agenda for some time and the main tool for that management is the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). Three aspects of the CFP above all others signal its failure. Best known of these is the now discredited practice of throwing back perfectly edible fish either because they were not the target species or because the boat catching them was over its quota. The intention behind the practice is good management, but it could only work if fish were returned alive and undamaged to the sea. Mostly they are dead; those that are alive have a low chance of survival.

Equally damaging but less well known is the process by which quota is set. The advice of fisheries scientists has, in the past, not been accepted as a given, but as a baseline from which the fisheries ministers of Europe can negotiate upwards, often declaring their increased share of an increased quota to be a triumph, when in truth it has been a disaster. Lastly, it is alarming that, having exploited our fisheries for so long, there should be so many – around 60% – for which we still do not have good scientific data. Throw in the fact that we still exploit many species without imposing a limit and you have the recipe for the disaster which has ensued. The current CFP runs until 2013 and it is already being reviewed. This constitutes what could well be a last opportunity to get it right.

Who could argue with a desire to move from overfishing to sustainable management of our fish stocks, working on the principle of ‘maximum sustainable yield’? The proposals recently put forward by EU Fisheries Commissioner Maria Damanaki aim to do just that. They argue that ‘if stocks were exploited at maximum sustainable yield this would increase stock size by 70%. Overall catches would increase by 17%, profit margins could be multiplied by a factor of three times, return on investment would be six times higher, and the gross value added for the catching industry would rise by almost 90%’. One might (perhaps churlishly) point out that, when stocks have declined by 90%, aiming to less than double the remaining 10% is a modest target. Nevertheless, it would mean a lot more fish in the sea and a much more productive, sustainable and long term fishing industry. Everyone should be satisfied.

Getting agreement that the fishing of the future should be neither wasteful nor damaging and must maximise sustainable harvests is relatively easy, but achieving these deceptively simple goals will require a profound change in the way we manage and exploit our fisheries. The journey to this promised land has to go via a pretty bumpy road. All fish caught must be landed, even when they are less valuable in the market place, until we can find more selective ways of targeting individual species.
The overall catch must fall for a while until stocks can recover. Species for which no sound data exists will have to be exploited well within likely limits using the ‘precautionary principle’. Species for which there are currently no quotas ought to be embraced by the system, though that is not currently part of the proposals being put forward. Most challenging of all is the need to fish in ways which do not have negative impacts on other species (such as dolphins and diving seabirds) and on the range of different habitats where the fish we eat are born, live and grow before we catch them. And finally, we will have to stop pursuing our prey wherever they are found. There must be parts of our seas where all marine life can find sanctuary – which is the purpose of the network of Marine Protected Areas proposed in the Marine Act and currently being evolved.

It is a harsh but inescapable fact that this will impact on a generation of fishermen. Many of them recognise the dilemma, understanding the need for long term sustainability while at the same time worrying about the likely impact on their own livelihoods of achieving it. Society as a whole must respond to this. The change is for the good of the whole; we cannot expect one small part to bear all the cost. If we wish to reduce fishing effort and the size of our fishing fleet, then investing public money in buying out capacity has to be part of the strategy.

The plans outlined by Maria Damanaki are largely sound and to be applauded – but they are only plans. They have yet to be subjected to the pressures of human interest, from individual member States and from those on whom they will impact. Only broad public support of the kind so skilfully whipped up by Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall will protect the plans. Everyone who cares about the future of our fisheries and our marine environment must make their voices heard. If we fail, a once in a lifetime opportunity will be lost and future generations will be left the poorer.

Future of our Living Seas

Thursday, January 6th, 2011

How often, over the past decade, have you heard the assertion that something needs to be ‘fit for the 21st century’? Two of the most recent candidates have been ‘a banking system’ and ‘a welfare state’, but there have been many others. It seems that, in all sorts of areas, we face challenges which we recognise as very different from what went before – the 20th century.

We can get a measure of the challenge we face by looking at the first decade of the 20th century – England under Edward VII, king from 1901 to 1910. If that decade had aspired to come up with a way of doing things ‘fit for the 20th century’, could they possibly have anticipated the demands which would be made on that system in the last decade of the century?

One thing is for sure – they weren’t agonising over putting in place an environmental management system fit for the 20th century. Their ambitions were for expansion and exploitation; in this they were remarkably successful. The concept of sustainability, an awareness of the limits of the Earth’s carrying capacity, even a concern for pollution did not shape their thinking. It took the whole of the century to catch up with those ideas.

Nowhere is that better illustrated than in the way we have managed our fisheries. Our seas are – or rather were – some of the most productive in the world. They have been fished for centuries, but the 20th century saw a change in capacity to exploit which could hardly have been dreamt of. From the introduction of the steam engine at the beginning to GIS at the end, fishing has become an increasingly sophisticated activity with an ever growing impact on the marine environment.

The litany of loss is a long one, from habitats damaged (there used to be a reef system at the mouth of the Exe, called the Exeters, for instance; there isn’t now) to species’ collapse (the North Sea herring) to near extinction (the common skate). It was no-one’s fault; the exploitation was urged on by and served the needs of society. During the same period of time, the land suffered a similar exploitation, with species rich natural habitats replaced by improved pasture, intensive arable and forestry plantation, monocultures all.

The challenge now is to put in place a fisheries management programme ‘fit for the 21st century’. And what a challenge it is! It is estimated that stocks of many species are one tenth of what they were 100 years ago. Then there are the problems of bycatch, of discards, of seabird declines for want of food, of damaging fishing methods. Not to mention attitudes to exploiting the sea which go back centuries and are hard to refashion.

So where to begin? As on land, the real need is to take the pressure off substantial areas so that wildlife can thrive as it once did. This won’t always mean excluding all activities; some fishing methods are not in themselves damaging (other than to populations of the target species, of course). But any effective network of marine protected areas will need some places where we take a hands off approach and let them be.

There is at last an emerging proposal to create such a network. It is being led in the South West by a project called ‘Finding Sanctuary’, which is getting close to making its recommendations. The fishermen are understandably nervous and have talked of fishing ‘ghost towns’ resulting if the ‘wrong’ decisions are made. They have also begun to distance themselves from Finding Sanctuary, even though they have been openly embraced by the project. Their anxiety reflects the gravity of the decisions which have to be made. This is a once in many lifetimes adjustment; it does not come without cost. Our generation stands to pay for the excesses of the past – what we are buying are Living Seas for future generations to fish sustainably.

Our use too must become more sustainable, which is why the newly formed Inshore Fishing and Conservation Authorities (IFCAs) have such a vital role to play. The Devon and Severn IFCA has not got off to a very promising start. Its role has been expanded to take in the very important habitats to be found in the Severn Estuary Special Area for Conservation (SAC). This has meant the involvement of several local authorities not part of the old Sea Fisheries Committee. Despite the fact that they will receive additional funding for the first four years to cover their contribution, despite the fact that the Authority is now as much about conservation as fisheries and despite the presence of the Severn Estuary SAC, some councillors have vowed not to play their part in the new body.

No doubt it will all settle down. We all benefit from a healthy and sustainable natural environment; it’s not instead of human services, it’s part of them. If we really can set up an ecologically coherent network of marine protected areas in the South West and the 4 IFCAs – Isles Of Scilly, Cornwall, Devon & Severn and Southern – oversee and legislate for sustainable use of resources, both inside and outside the network, then it is just possible they will look back in the 2190s and be grateful to this generation for setting up a marine management system ‘fit for the 21th century’.