Archive for November, 2011

Cricklepit garden – mild November

Friday, November 18th, 2011

Jessica Gowing, Cricklepit garden volunteer, writes about her last two weeks in the garden:

The weather has been very mild for November!! I am interested in learning about the effects of our mild autumn on wildlife and would like to get some ideas on how we can help our garden species cope with this and maybe design a few features for the garden.
In Garden Group last Wednesday we hard pruned the buddleia in the rain (which I found surprisingly satisfying), however looking across the leat I find myself missing the buddleia purely because of the attractiveness of them! I know next year, though, we can expect lots of wonderful new shoots of buddleia popping up in spring which will be very exciting! I am looking forward to seeing all the insects and butterflies frolicking on the flowers again in the sunshine!! Lets hope the frost doesn’t get to them over the winter. We cut up the larger buddleia branches and made a small covered habitat pile behind the cottage bed to encourage a home for frogs and other wildlife in the spring or maybe hedgehogs in the autumn… and made a brush pile with the rest next to the wormery/compost heap. The group also did another small task making a sand border around the ponds (to make it look nice – and to prevent anyone putting their foot in there!).
When the weather has been very wet I have been in the office compiling a plant photo ID of the habitat beds in the garden. There are five themed beds, which are coast, Culm grassland, woodland, moorland and cottage. I will start weeding them next week, but some of the beds will be more difficult because a lot of the plants look like weeds! I also noticed some big unripe strawberries in the cottage themed bed which means it really is a strangely mild autumn so far!

I have some ideas for the labyrinth too, and would like to prepare something exciting for the Christmas at Cricklepit event on Saturday 3rd December.

Read Jess’s blog next week for further updates on Cricklepit Garden.

Looking forward to Devon

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

Devon Wildlife Trust’s new Chief Executive, Harry Barton, is relishing the task ahead.

Devon Wildlife Trust's new CEO, Harry BartonWhat an absolute thrill to be coming to Devon! We can all get a little tired of hearing places claim that they are the most varied, the most beautiful or unique. But Devon is one of the few that can make a justified claim on all these fronts. For a start, how many counties can boast two coastlines and two national parks? And it’s not just the geography – wherever I go, the landscape just oozes colour, charm and vibrance. And parts of Devon have that quality that so many of us yearn for but which we have almost totally lost throughout much of England – wildness.

As I write this I am in the luxurious position of being able to wax lyrical about the county’s natural wonders without (yet) getting stuck into the real challenge of protecting them. I know there are some tough tests ahead. In August, a piece of research pointed out that we need to do much more and protect far greater area of land and oceans if we want to stem the tide of biodiversity loss. We’ve got a long way to go before we are anywhere close to sensible management of our marine habitats. And we watch anxiously as the policy wheels of the EU grind out a new direction for farming.

It’s absolutely right that we remember the big picture and our responsibility to tackle the huge issues. But I also believe there is plenty to be hopeful about. At long last – and thanks in no small part to the work of Devon Wildlife Trust – a sensible debate about how we manage our seas is taking place. And while so much wildlife has been lost, browsing through the DWT nature reserves book or the recent report on Culm grassland is a welcome reminder of how much is now in safe hands. Of course we need to do much, much more. But the fightback is well underway!

The Wildlife Trusts have played a crucial role in helping stem the tide. I’m convinced that the bedrock of conservation is the sheer passion that goes with caring about landscapes close to our hearts. It’s the uncompromising belief that, no matter what may happen, we will fight to protect the places we feel are special. There’s bags of that passion in Devon and that, as much as anything, is why I am so looking forward to joining the Devon Wildlife Trust.

Signing off – After 23 years as its Director Paul Gompertz is retiring from Devon Wildlife Trust

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

Here in his last article for Wild Devon Devon Wildlife Trust Director, Paul Gompertz,  reflects on what has been achieved, what has not and what the future for the county’s wildlife might hold.

Devon Wildlife Trust's Director for 23 years, Paul GompertzI shudder to think how many millions of words I have churned out for the Devon Wildlife Trust during my 23 years working here, from passionate appeals to detailed terms and conditions of employment. But few pieces have been harder to write than this, my last article for Wild Devon as Director. Where to begin? And indeed, where to end? The swallows and martins are operating in large flocks over my house now, gathering by instinct for a journey some of them don’t even know they are going to make. In our rivers salmon are waiting patiently to spawn; their offspring will one day set off, alone and unguided, on a journey to their adult feeding grounds around Greenland. I have just walked through Cricklepit Mill to make a cup of tea, saw the dipper foraging in the leat and realised it had brought a smile to my face. The abiding sensation of my time here is one of wonder; I have had the privilege of sharing many wildlife sights and insights with people more knowledgeable than me and every one of them has added to an ever-growing awe at the myriad of wondrous, inventive and extraordinary ways in which Life manifests itself in Devon.

Success and failure
For someone who, not so very long ago, did not know that orchids could be found in the Devon countryside or that corals could be found off its coasts, the revelations afforded me by the privilege of being Director of DWT have been a source of huge personal fulfilment. There is, however, a profoundly gloomy downside to knowing that, if things don’t change soon – and dramatically – that same fulfilment will be lost to future generations. That sense of paradox has dogged my time here. I feel as if I have borne witness simultaneously to great success and great failure. When I was appointed in 1988, most of the targets I was set were organisational. I suppose there was an assumption that DWT knew about conservation; all of the challenge seemed to be about resources. So I was charged to ‘raise membership, raise money and raise the profile’. The first two are measurable. Our membership back then was around 2,000 (though records were a little uncertain!); it now stands at around 33,000. Our annual income then was about £100,000. Last year it was just over £3million. In those two areas at least we have had demonstrable success. And while it is hard to measure profile, in 2010/11 (a record year) we had 24 items on national TV and radio, on top of all our regional and local coverage. We weren’t doing that in 1988!

Two great campaigns

I did get involved in conservation, despite its absence from my list of targets! When, in 1989, a survey revealed that, of the remaining patches of Culm grassland not protected by being a Site of Special Scientific Interest, around 60% had, in a five year period, been lost or damaged, even I could see the need to act. Though resources were tight, we employed a Culm Grassland Officer. We lobbied for an about to be trialled agri-environment scheme – Countryside Stewardship – to use Culm grassland as a pilot habitat, and succeeded. We devised a broader scheme, called Green Gateway, with help from Devon Waste Management. We got both the County Council and South West Water engaged. We worked closely throughout with English Nature (now Natural England). Today we have ten people committed to the conservation of this most glorious of Devon habitats, home to the marsh fritillary, one of Europe’s ten most threatened animals. Our Working Wetlands scheme has already made over 1,000 farm visits, with many more to come. It has begun to restore large areas of Culm which had been lost to forestry and agriculture. And it was cited as an example of best practice in landscape scale conservation. That feels like success.

Corkwing in South Devon (Paul Naylor)The Lyme Bay Reefs campaign feels like success, too. Ignorant as I then was, even I could see that the destruction being caused to pretty marine things (which I now know to call marine ecosystems!) was appalling. That campaign too began with the appointment of a project officer and built from there. It took 15 years, half a million pounds and a great deal of pressure on successive Secretaries of State and Fisheries Ministers to get 60 square miles of Lyme Bay Reefs protected – and set a precedent which I like to think was a key step along the way to the Marine and Coastal Access Act and the Government’s current commitment that ‘by the end of 2016 in excess of 25% of English waters will be contained in a well-managed Marine Protected Area network’ and that ‘by 2020 we will be managing and harvesting fish sustainably’. With goals in place like that, where does the sense of ‘great failure’ come from?

Missed targets
It comes from the insidious conviction that all that we are currently doing is too little, too late. The latest strategy document from Government admits that ‘over 40% of priority habitats and 30% of priority species’ are still declining. The latest report from the International Programme on the State of our Oceans (IPSO) tells us that ‘we have underestimated the overall risks and that the whole of marine degradation is greater than the sum of its parts’. Biodiversity 2020 – the Government’s new strategy to reverse the decline in wildlife – doesn’t pay a backward glance to Biodiversity 2010, the strategy which was supposed to have the same effect in the previous decade. The Secretary General of the UN Convention on biological diversity called that collective failure ‘a total disaster’ saying ‘no country has met its targets to protect nature. We are losing biodiversity at an unprecedented rate, amounting to a mass extinction of life’. Moreover, some of the strategy now being put forward is, to my mind, cloud cuckoo land. Our Government ‘rejects the outdated idea that environmental action is a barrier to growth’ which clearlyidentifies me as well past my sell-by date. It pledges to ‘improve the delivery of environmental outcomes from agricultural land management practices, whilst increasing food production’, a trick which will need more smoke and mirrors than I am able to imagine. This seems to me a classic example of a particularly profound insight offered up by Jonathan Porritt: ‘The single most important precept behind the very idea of sustainability – that we have to learn to prosper within nature’s limits, not beyond them – is still set aside by almost all and sundry as an irritating irrelevance’. I have taken to prefacing the talks I give with the observation that ‘I am grateful that, for most of my career in wildlife conservation, I thought there was hope’. It is partly for effect, of course – but there is a strong kernel of truth in there too. I need to stop because I have heard too much of it all before, seen too many false dawns, read too much glib political spin – ‘The Government wants this to be the first generation to leave the natural environment of England in a better state than it was inherited’, for instance, which simply won’t happen; you heard it here first.

An end and a beginning
I’m not the first to play their part in the work of Devon Wildlife Trust and be drained by it, and I won’t be the last. What matters is that the organisation keeps going. The task was even more daunting when our founders set us up; the downward trends were worse back then, and there was less willingness to listen. I am proud of the part I have played, but ready to stop. DWT will continue, driven by its goal of a Devon rich in wildlife, spurred by the growing evidence that wildlife is vital to human existence and that saving it is saving ourselves. I wish Harry Barton, my successor, every good fortune. And my profound thanks to everyone who has been involved during my time here. We made a difference together; the task remains.

You told us
Wild Devon tracked down three people who joined DWT as members in 1988 – the year Paul Gompertz became the organisation’s Director. We asked them their views of the charity after many years of membership:

I shall remain a member for as long as I am around and hope to become more involved now I am retired. Keep up your dedication and all your hard work.
Elaine Underhill

My interest in DWT has been general, enjoying its various success stories. I think the appearance of otters at DWT’s Cricklepit Mill does stand out. I have always enjoyed being a member. In the last 23 years I have watched the growth and importance of The Trust and hope and believe it will continue with its all important work in the future.
Mrs M Steiner

The impact of DWT over the last 23 years has come in three overlapping areas: Acquiring and managing more nature reserves that broadly represent Devon’s variety of habitats and contain its most charismatic species. Continuing the work of environmental interpretation to create a more informed and more concerned public and thus sustain the work of The Trust. Practical assistance to private landowners to enhance the conservation potential of their land and integrate DWT’s reserves into a more wildlife-friendly countryside.
John Bradbeer

Can you help Paul?
Director Paul Gompertz is asking for support towards Devon Wildlife Trust’s Sustainable Fisheries Campaign, a subject very close to his heart. If you would like to make a donation, please contact DWT on 01392 279244 or visit www.devonwildlifetrust.org/latest-appeal/

New face of Cricklepit’s Garden!

Thursday, November 10th, 2011

Garden Volunteer Jessica GowingHello! I’m Jess and I have been very lucky to start an eight week work experience placement with Devon Wildlife Trust at their Cricklepit Mill HQ based near the Quay in Exeter. I am currently training with BTCV to receive my horticulture qualification and will be writing a weekly blog about my work at DWT.

My role is to maintain the garden and its features and come up with a management plan, and also to research new ideas for new wildlife features! I will also be coordinating the volunteer garden group (see below for details). Despite its urban setting the garden is a wildlife haven with otters, kingfishers, butterflies and dippers visiting regularly. I hope to develop more habitats to encourage other wildlife inhabitants to the garden. Some of the tasks I have lined up in the next few weeks are maintenance of the labyrinth, buddleia management, management plans for the woodland ‘island’, development of a garden trail and creation of more wildlife friendly features. I am passionate about conservation and preserving our wonderful wildlife so I am looking forward to getting stuck into this role. The idea of creating a range of habitats and wildlife features at Cricklepit is very exciting. The wildlife here is fascinating and maintaining the garden with the volunteers is going to be challenging but very rewarding!

Cricklepit Garden Group
If you would like to get involved in the Wednesday garden group at Cricklepit Mill click here for more information. The group always welcome new members; you don’t need to be a garden expert!

Will the CAP reforms go far enough?

Monday, November 7th, 2011

If you were looking for an issue that united pretty much everyone in contempt, a hot contender would be the EU Common Agricultural Policy.

Everyone has their own view of what’s wrong and what needs to change.  Secretary of State Caroline Spelman wants farms to become more competitive and less reliant on grant aid.  Farmers of all persuasion want less regulation, and pretty much everyone is now talking about food security and whether we can produce enough to feed a growing and increasingly demanding world population. But we are in real danger of losing sight of the role farmers play in looking after our countryside and its wildlife.

Next year it will be 50 years since Rachel Carson published her seminal work, Silent Spring, which gave a chilling vision of a countryside where bird song had been obliterated by “modern” farming, in particular the use of agrochemicals, so prevalent at that time.  Fortunately this brave new world has not materialised, but it’s easy to forget just how much we have lost – half our ancient woods, 98% of our wildflower meadows, and goodness knows how many birds, butterflies and other insects. Not all of these are irreversible, but it is a lot harder, and far more expensive, to put back something we’ve lost than to maintain what we have.

From an environmental point of view the CAP has been a mixed blessing.  It has undoubtedly contributed to chronic overgrazing and long term damage to many sensitive habitats, including on Exmoor and Dartmoor.  But despite its many faults, it has funded a lot wildlife management such as maintaining hedges, ditches and field margins.  These modest and often unassuming features of the countryside are the refuges in which wildlife can still thrive within our heavily managed rural landscapes.  And the mechanisms through which it does so are the agri-environment schemes.

Agri-environment schemes have been around since the late 1980s.  They arose out of the furore surrounding the continued destruction of hedges, marshes, wildflower meadows and other treasured features of the landscape.  Subsidies for producing food, combined with the cost and effort involved with managing some of these sites, gave many farmers little incentive other than to put these features under the plough.  Through these schemes, farmers were paid directly to conserve and recreate these habitats.

We know from studies across Europe that the amount and variety of wildlife is greater in fields that are in agri-environment schemes, whether you are looking at bees, plants or spiders.  Birds such as the cirl bunting and stone curlew have done particularly well, as have native mammals such as hedgehog and brown hare.  A national study funded by the government highlighted the upland hay meadows on Dartmoor as a particular success story.

Last week I had a wonderful day being introduced to a number of sites in North Devon where the Devon Wildlife Trust is working with its partners, including many local farmers, to recreate Culm grassland, one of the nation’s rarest habitats and a great place to see the beautiful marsh fritillary butterfly or the ghostly shape of the barn owl.  What is really impressive is just how much of this is happening outside nature reserves and on land owned by local farmers. Drab, largely lifeless stands of sitka spruce are being transformed on an impressive scale.  This work would simply not be possible without agri-environment schemes.  What really struck me though was the potential to role this out on a far larger scale.  We could be thinking about whole river catchments where a significant amount of land is put over to wildlife habitat.  This would help to regulate water flows in times of drought and flood, and improve water quality.

If we want to see our existing wildlife survive, let alone putting back something akin to what we had thirty years ago, we need to be thinking on a much more ambitious scale.  The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), challenges us to manage at least 10% of our land with wildlife in mind.  At the moment we are nowhere near this figure.  Managing with nature in mind doesn’t exclude farming, but it does mean using less intense farming methods.  But if 10% still sounds a lot, it’s worth remembering that this is less than many of our European neighbours, and far less than countries like Brazil and Indonesia, who we often malign for their attitudes towards their natural environments.

A vision on this scale would mean a lot more funding for agri-environment schemes.  It would also mean thinking much more imaginatively about how farmers can be rewarded for helping to control flooding and low water flows in drought years, minimise soil erosion and the resulting pollution of rivers, and minimise emissions of greenhouse gases.  There would be a significant cost of course, but I’m far from alone in strongly suspecting that the financial benefits from these “ecosystem services” would outweigh the costs.  We are working on a model to test this in the Culm.

So why aren’t we doing this?  Fundamentally it comes down to a lack of vision and political will.  There seems to be almost universal disappointment in the proposed CAP reforms announced last week.  Its weakness is less about what’s in the proposals than it is about what isn’t.  Sadly, we shouldn’t be too surprised.  There are so many competing calls for what the farming of the future should look like that a mealy mouthed compromise promising little of significance to anyone was always going to be hard to avoid.

But we have to face the facts.  Every year there are more of us, each putting more pressure on the Earth’s finite resources.  We just don’t have enough land to provide us all with abundant cheap food and space for wildlife, to say nothing of the many other demands we create.  This is a truly tough problem to solve it’s true, but it would be nice to think that politicians across Europe had the foresight and courage to start tackling it.  As Albeit Enstein said, you can’t solve a problem with the same thinking that created the problem in the first place.